If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. what is a safe distance from a cell tower have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.