If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, https://yilmaz-pitts.hubstack.net/are-usually-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-structure-1682829260 revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is safe distance to live from cell phone tower that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In safe distance to live from cell phone tower , psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.